Redefining Family in Taiwan: The Impact of Same-Sex Marriage Legalization on Household Structures and Gender Roles

Runjia Zhou

Authors

Runjia Zhou University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada Author

Keywords:

same-sex marriage, gender roles, family structure, role negotiation, Taiwan

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of Taiwan's legalization of same-sex marriage on gender roles, family structures, and household responsibilities. Using semi-structured interviews with 15 same-sex couples, along with data from the 2020 East Asian Social Survey and Taiwan's marriage registration statistics, the study investigates how same-sex marriage reshapes traditional gender roles and family forms. The research employs a mixed-methods approach and integrates queer theory, modernity theory, and gender role transformation theory. Findings demonstrate that same-sex couples display flexibility and negotiation in distributing household tasks, childcare, and economic support, based on individual preferences and abilities rather than traditional gender norms. The legalization of same-sex marriage in Taiwan has promoted gender equality and led to the diversification of family structures, particularly in urban areas where LGBTQ+ families are increasingly accepted. These findings provide valuable insights for other East Asian countries facing challenges in reconciling traditional family values with modern social changes.

References

1. S. McLanahan and C. Percheski, "Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities," Annu. Rev. Sociol., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 257–276, 2008, doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134549.

2. L. J. Cho, Culture, Institutions, and Economic Development in East Asia, in Korea's Political Economy, 1st ed. Routledge, 2019, pp. 3–41. ISBN: 9780429046698.

3. W. Y. Chung, "Gendering distance, gendered housework: Examining the gendered power dynamics through housework al-location in Taiwanese homes," Gend. Place Cult., vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1594–1615, 2022, doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2021.1974355.

4. R. W. Connell, Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford Univ. Press, 1987, ISBN: 9780804714303.

5. M. S. Das and P. D. Bardis, Eds., The Family in Asia. Taylor & Francis, 2023, doi: 10.4324/9781003414438.

6. S. L. Friedman and Y. C. Chen, "Will marriage rights bring family equality? Law, lesbian co-mothers, and strategies of recog-nition in Taiwan," positions, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 551–579, 2021, doi: 10.1215/10679847-8978347.

7. M. S. Kuo and H. W. Chen, "The Brown moment in Taiwan: Making sense of the law and politics of the Taiwanese same-sex marriage case in a comparative light," Colum. J. Asian Law, vol. 31, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.7916/cjal.v31i1.3362.

8. P. Laslett and R. Wall, Household and Family in Past Times. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1972, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511561207.

9. I. P. Y. Lo, S. W. K. Yu, G. Ho, I. Ng, and S. M. Lee, "The cross-regional impact of Taiwan’s same-sex marriage legalisation: The queer economy of welfare mix," Soc. Policy Soc., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 477–492, 2024, doi: 10.1017/S1474746424000083.

10. N. Chodorow, "Family structure and feminine personality," in Feminism and Philosophy, Routledge, 2018, pp. 199–216. ISBN: 9780429500527.

11. R. F. Bales and T. Parsons, Family: Socialization and Interaction Process. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014, doi: 10.4324/9781315824307.

12. A. Rich, "Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence," Signs J. Women Cult. Soc., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 631–660, 1980, doi: 10.1086/493756.

13. K. A. Roberto and R. Blieszner, "Diverse family structures and the care of older persons," Can. J. Aging, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 305–320, 2015, doi: 10.1017/S0714980815000288.

14. D. T. S. Tang, D. Khor, and Y. C. Chen, "Legal recognition of same-sex partnerships: A comparative study of Hong Kong, Taiwan and Japan," Sociol. Rev., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 192–208, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0038026119858222.