Adaptive Intelligence in Robo-Advisory: A Framework for Risk Control and Return Optimization

Authors

  • Tianyi Wang Business School, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410083, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/x5xsg430

Keywords:

adaptive intelligence, robo-advisory, risk control, explainable AI, capital markets

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into financial services has transformed investment management. However, existing robo-advisory systems remain limited by static optimization, constrained risk adaptability, and opaque decision-making processes. To overcome these challenges, this study introduces an Adaptive Intelligence Framework (AIF) that integrates reinforcement learning, modern portfolio theory, and explainable AI (XAI) to enable dynamic risk control and transparent return optimization. Employing a mixed-method approach that combines theoretical modeling, comparative case studies (BlackRock Aladdin and Betterment), and empirical simulations on verified global market data from 2018 to 2024, the framework demonstrated superior performance, achieving an 11.6% increase in cumulative return, a 17.3% reduction in volatility, and a high interpretability score of 0.82. These findings indicate that adaptive algorithms can simultaneously enhance stability and transparency under non-stationary market conditions. The study advances financial AI research by linking quantitative finance with algorithmic accountability and provides a practical blueprint for developing trustworthy, regulation-aligned robo-advisory systems capable of balancing efficiency, explainability, and resilience in capital markets.

References

1. B. Kumari, J. Kaur, and S. Swami, "Adoption of artificial intelligence in financial services: a policy framework," Journal of Sci-ence and Technology Policy Management, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 396-417, 2024.

2. O. Onabowale, "The rise of AI and Robo-Advisors: Redefining financial strategies in the digital age," International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, vol. 6, 2024. doi: 10.55248/gengpi.6.0125.0640

3. A. S. George, "Robo-Revolution: Exploring the Rise of Automated Financial Advising Systems and Their Impacts on Man-agement Practices," Partners Universal Multidisciplinary Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1-6, 2024.

4. F. Khosravi, "Transforming Investment Advisory Services Through Artificial Intelligence: A Study on Robo-Advisors and Algorithmic Portfolio Management," Nuvern Applied Science Reviews, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1-8, 2024.

5. M. Tahvildari, "Integrating generative AI in Robo-Advisory: A systematic review of opportunities, challenges, and strategic solutions," Multidisciplinary Reviews, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 2025379-2025379, 2025.

6. X. Li, "Unveiling portfolio resilience: Harnessing asymmetric copulas for dynamic risk assessment in the knowledge econo-my," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 10200-10226, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01503-6

7. J. Laux, "Institutionalised distrust and human oversight of artificial intelligence: towards a democratic design of AI govern-ance under the European Union AI Act," AI & society, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 2853-2866, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s00146-023-01777-z

8. A. Garad, H. A. Riyadh, A. M. Al-Ansi, and B. A. H. Beshr, "Unlocking financial innovation through strategic investments in information management: a systematic review," Discover Sustainability, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 381, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00542-6

9. S. J. Owoade, A. Uzoka, J. I. Akerele, and P. U. Ojukwu, "Enhancing financial portfolio management with predictive analytics and scalable data modeling techniques," International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 2678-2690, 2024.

10. O. Irekponor, "Designing resilient AI architectures for predictive energy finance systems amid data sovereignty, adversarial threats, and policy volatility," International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 73-100, 2025. doi: 10.55248/gengpi.6.0625.2125

11. A. M. Beauty, "Explainable AI in data-driven finance: balancing algorithmic transparency with operational optimization de-mands," Int J Adv Res Publ Rev, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 125-49, 2025.

12. R. Zhang, Y. Guo, and Q. Yang, "Transforming linear regression with AI-driven enhancements for superior forecasting ro-bustness and interpretability," International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, vol. 26, no. 14, pp. 44-61, 2025. doi: 10.1504/ijict.2025.146368

13. N. I. Qureshi, S. S. Choudhuri, Y. Nagamani, R. A. Varma, and R. Shah, "Ethical considerations of AI in financial services: Pri-vacy, bias, and algorithmic transparency," In 2024 International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Communication Systems (ICKECS), April, 2024, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.1109/ickecs61492.2024.10616483

14. B. Lund, Z. Orhan, N. R. Mannuru, R. V. K. Bevara, B. Porter, M. K. Vinaih, and P. Bhaskara, "Standards, frameworks, and legislation for artificial intelligence (AI) transparency," AI and Ethics, pp. 1-17, 2025.

15. A. Chinnaraju, "Explainable AI (XAI) for trustworthy and transparent decision-making: A theoretical framework for AI inter-pretability," World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 170-207, 2025.

Downloads

Published

08 November 2025

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Wang, T. (2025). Adaptive Intelligence in Robo-Advisory: A Framework for Risk Control and Return Optimization. European Journal of Business, Economics & Management, 1(4), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.71222/x5xsg430