The Influence of ESG Factors on Corporate Financing Costs in Emerging Markets

Wenbo Zhang

doi:10.71222/13w2mg46

Authors

Wenbo Zhang The Institute of International Education, Concord University College, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350117, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/13w2mg46

Keywords:

emerging markets, financing costs, ESG performance, governance, environmental

Abstract

Emerging-market firms often face elevated financing costs due to macroeconomic volatility, institutional weaknesses, and environmental risks. Yet most existing studies focus on developed economies, leaving limited evidence on how environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors affect debt pricing in emerging contexts. This study addresses this gap by adopting a mixed-methods design, combining panel regression analysis of firm-level ESG ratings, financial indicators, and macroeconomic data from 2023 to 2025 with comparative case studies of firms implementing substantial ESG reforms. The econometric results show that superior ESG performance is significantly associated with lower financing costs, with governance and environmental pillars exerting the strongest influence, while social factors have weaker and statistically insignificant effects. Case evidence further illustrates how governance reforms and environmental commitments lead to favorable refinancing terms, whereas social initiatives yield mainly reputational benefits. These findings extend ESG-financing research to emerging markets and provide practical insights for managers, investors, and policymakers seeking to lower capital costs and strengthen sustainable finance.

References

1. J. Junaedi, "Understanding the role of finance in sustainable development: A qualitative study on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices," Golden Ratio of Finance Management, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 113-130, 2024, doi: 10.52970/grfm.v4i2.422.

2. S. S. Chopra, S. S. Senadheera, P. D. Dissanayake, P. A. Withana, R. Chib, J. H. Rhee, and Y. S. Ok, "Navigating the challenges of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting: The path to broader sustainable development," Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 606, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16020606.

3. S. Mazzioni, C. K. Soschinski, M. Leite, C. B. D. Magro, and S. L. R. Sanches, "ESG performance in emerging economies," Macro Management & Public Policies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21-35, 2024, doi: 10.30564/mmpp.v6i1.6202.

4. S. Chen, Y. Song, and P. Gao, "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance," Journal of environmental management, vol. 345, p. 118829, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829.

5. G. Claeys, C. McCaffrey, and L. Welslau, "The rising cost of European Union borrowing and what to do about it (No. 12/2023)," Bruegel Policy Brief, 2023.

6. M. Kumar, and P. K. Prasanna, "Credit spread drivers and cross-country connectedness: a study of emerging economies in Asia," Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 338-350, 2024, doi: 10.1108/jabes-10-2023-0392.

7. M. Tarczynska-Luniewska, S. Maciukaite-Zviniene, N. Nareswari, and U. Ciptomulyono, "Analysing the complexity of ESG integration in emerging economies: an examination of key challenges," In Exploring ESG Challenges and Opportunities: Navi-gating Towards a Better Future, 2024, pp. 41-60, doi: 10.1108/s1569-375920240000116004.

8. A. S. A. P. Salin, R. Abd Wahab, A. Adam, and W. R. W. Abdullah, "Leveraging Risk Management to Enhance ESG Perfor-mance,".

9. J. Zou, P. Chen, X. Fu, and C. Gong, "Does carbon trading affect the bond spread of high-carbon enterprises?-Evidence from China," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 417, p. 137882, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137882.

10. Y. Zhang, Y. Deng, O. Yang, D. Xia, and H. Liu, "Substantive or symbolic? The strategic choice of sustainable environmental strategy for enterprises induced by the new environmental protection law," Sustainable Development, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 7461-7481, 2024, doi: 10.1002/sd.3100.

11. D. L. Crumbley, S. D. Grossman, and A. M. Grossman, "ESG Reporting Issues Perpetuating Fraud Litigation," Journal of Foren-sic and Investigative Accounting, vol. 16, no. 2, 2024.

12. X. Deng, W. Li, and X. Ren, "More sustainable, more productive: Evidence from ESG ratings and total factor productivity among listed Chinese firms," Finance Research Letters, vol. 51, p. 103439, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103439.

13. X. Bao, M. Sadiq, W. Tye, and J. Zhang, "The impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rating disparities on corporate risk: The mediating role of financing constraints," Journal of environmental management, vol. 371, p. 123113, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123113.

14. J. Lefournier, "The design flaw in sustainability-linked bonds," Chair Energy & Prosperity Working Paper, no. 06, 2023.

15. T. J. Boulton, "Mandatory ESG disclosure, information asymmetry, and litigation risk: Evidence from initial public offerings," European Financial Management, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 2790-2839, 2024, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4399682.