Academic and Practical Cases: From TFP Variables in DEA-Malmquist Model to the Conduction of County-Level Digital Agriculture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/wtt83c67Keywords:
digital agriculture, total factor productivity, DEA-malmquist index, smart sensors, precision agricultureAbstract
This paper investigates the construction and practical implementation of digital agriculture at the county level in China by integrating academic theories and real-world cases. Utilizing the DEA-Malmquist index model, key input variables such as labor, land, machinery, chemical fertilizers, and irrigation are analyzed to measure total factor productivity (TFP) growth in digital agriculture. The study highlights the critical role of smart sensors, big data, artificial intelligence, and Internet of Things technologies in enhancing agricultural productivity, resource optimization, and sustainable development. The paper further explores digital agriculture management systems, including production management, product traceability, and integrated management platforms, which collectively facilitate precision farming, traceability, and intelligent decision-making. The construction path emphasizes government-enterprise cooperation, data integration, and technological innovation, driving transformation from traditional experience-based agriculture to data-driven precision agriculture. The practical value lies in ensuring food security, promoting industrial upgrading, increasing farmers' income, and supporting the global green transformation. Finally, the paper provides policy recommendations focusing on technological advancement, infrastructure improvement, and talent cultivation to foster the sustainable development of digital agriculture in China.
References
1. D. Zhou, "Technical progress, technical efficiency and productivity growth of China’s agriculture," J. Quant. Tech. Econ., vol. 26, pp. 70–82, 2009.
2. H. Shi, L. Meng, and H. Wang, "Research on regional differences and volatility of agricultural productivity in China: Analysis based on stochastic frontier production function," J. Econ. Sci., no. 3, pp. 20–33, 2008, doi: 10.1016/S1049-0078(99)00034-2.
3. S. Fan and X. Zhao, "Production and productivity growth in Chinese agriculture: New national and regional measures," J. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change, vol. 50, pp. 819–838, 2002, doi: 10.1086/343136.
4. S. L. Wang, J. Huang, X. Wang, and F. Tuan, "Are China’s regional agricultural productivities converging: How and why?," Food Policy, vol. 86, pp. 101727, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.05.010.
5. R. Ming and G. Li, "Growth and decomposition of China's grain total factor productivity under environmental constraints: Observations based on provincial panel data and sequential Malmquist Luenberger index," J. Econ. Rev., no. 5, pp. 34–42, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.05.010.
6. L. Hou, Y. Zhang, J. Zhan, and T. Glauben, “Marginal revenue of land and total factor productivity in Chinese agriculture: Evidence from spatial analysis,” J. Geogr. Sci., vol. 22, pp. 167–178, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11442-012-0919-0.
7. P. Guo, K. Yu, and Y. Huang, “Changes and decomposition of regional differences in agricultural total factor productivity in China: A study based on the Färe Primont productivity index,” J. Econ. Geogr., vol. 33, pp. 141–145, 2013.
8. F. Gao, “Evolution trend and internal mechanism of regional total factor productivity in Chinese agriculture,” J. Quant. Tech. Econ., vol. 32, pp. 3–19+53, 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chenxi Hu (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.