Cross-Cultural Characteristics of Human-Machine Parasocial Interaction and Its Impact on Social Substitution Behavior

Authors

  • Yantong Lin Faculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, China Author
  • Yulin Zhao School of Journalism and Communication, Northwest University of Political and Law, Xi'an, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/4yvkdr37

Keywords:

parasocial interaction, human-machine interaction, cross-cultural context, social substitution, intelligent agents

Abstract

With the rapid proliferation of intelligent agents, conversational artificial intelligence, and virtual companions, human--machine parasocial interaction has emerged as a critically important research topic in the contemporary digital era. As these technologies become increasingly anthropomorphized, users frequently develop profound, one-sided emotional attachments to machines. Crucially, cultural background fundamentally shapes how individuals perceive, trust, and engage with artificial intelligence, thereby influencing the extent to which such digital interactions might substitute for traditional, interpersonal social relationships. This study comprehensively explores the cross-cultural characteristics of human--machine parasocial interaction, meticulously examining its differentiated manifestations across various global cultural contexts. By investigating established cultural dimensions such as individualism versus collectivism and high-context versus low-context communication, the research elucidates how distinct cultural paradigms dictate user expectations, relational dynamics, and emotional investments in machines. Furthermore, it critically assesses the subsequent impact on social substitution behaviors, analyzing whether artificial intelligence companions effectively alleviate human loneliness or inadvertently exacerbate societal isolation. By integrating cultural theory, communication studies, and human--computer interaction research, this paper constructs a robust comparative framework for future empirical investigations. Ultimately, the study proposes actionable governance strategies and ethical design guidelines aimed at balancing rapid technological innovation with long-term social well-being, ensuring that artificial intelligence serves to augment rather than replace genuine human connection.

References

1. P. Léna, "Robotics in the Classroom: Hopes or Threats?," in Robotics, AI, and Humanity: Science, Ethics, and Policy, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 109-117.

2. D. Matsumoto, S. H. Yoo, and J. Fontaine, "Mapping expressive differences around the world: The relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism," Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 55-74, 2008.

3. L. C. Contiua, M. R. Gaborb, and D. Stefanescuc, "Hofstede's cultural dimensions and student's ability to develop an entrepreneurial spirit," Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 46, pp. 5553-5557, 2012.

4. L. I. Labrecque, "Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction," Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 134-148, 2014.

5. O. Albasheer et al., "The impact of social isolation and loneliness on cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and bibliometric investigation," Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 12871, 2024.

6. C. T. Su, R. D. McMahan, B. A. Williams, R. K. Sharma, and R. L. Sudore, "Family matters: Effects of birth order, culture, and family dynamics on surrogate decision‐making," Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 175-182, 2014.

7. M. Dechant et al., "Assessing the relationship between subjective trust, confidence measurements, and mouse trajectory characteristics in an online task," arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16632, 2023.

8. H. Parker, M. Chignell, and L. Ruppenthal, "Measurement of technology mediated communication style: the communication preferences inventory (CPI)," in *Proceedings of the 2002 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research*, Sept. 2002, p. 8.

9. M. C. Daderwal, V. S. Sreeraj, S. Suhas, N. P. Rao, and G. Venkatasubramanian, "Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) as a screening tool for evaluation of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia," Psychiatry Research, vol. 316, p. 114731, 2022.

10. T. Maeda and A. Quan-Haase, "When human-AI interactions become parasocial: Agency and anthropomorphism in affective design," in *Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency*, June 2024, pp. 1068-1077.

11. E. C. Y. Li and K. W. Pang, "Fandom meets artificial intelligence: Rethinking participatory culture as human–community–machine interactions," European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 778-787, 2024.

12. K. Zhang, Y. Xie, D. Chen, Z. Ji, and J. Wang, "Effects of attractions and social attributes on peoples’ usage intention and media dependence towards chatbot: The mediating role of parasocial interaction and emotional support," BMC Psychology, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 986, 2025.

Downloads

Published

01 July 2026

How to Cite

Lin, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2026). Cross-Cultural Characteristics of Human-Machine Parasocial Interaction and Its Impact on Social Substitution Behavior. Pinnacle Academic Press Proceedings Series, 11, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.71222/4yvkdr37