Chemical Safety Assessment of 3D Printed Food Materials and Development of Innovative Formulations

Junming Feng

doi:10.71222/cmdnjg87

Authors

Junming Feng Zhuhai Oriental Yinghua International Academy, Zhuhai, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/cmdnjg87

Keywords:

3d printed food, chemical safety, food formulation, food materials, risk assessment, food processing

Abstract

As an emerging and transformative technology in the culinary and food manufacturing sectors, the development of 3D printed food heavily depends on the continuous optimization of material systems and the rigorous assurance of chemical safety. This paper comprehensively analyzes the diverse types and functional characteristics of 3D printed food materials, encompassing basic nutritional ingredients (such as cereals, high-quality proteins, and various fruits and vegetables), essential food additives (including thickeners, stabilizers, and gelling agents), and specialized printing auxiliary materials (such as supporting structures and binding agents). Building upon this foundational classification, the review systematically discusses the full-chain risk associated with chemical safety assessment. This involves a detailed examination of natural toxins and pesticide residues in basic agricultural ingredients, the strict regulatory compliance of synthetic additives, the potential residue migration from auxiliary materials, complex chemical changes occurring during thermal or mechanical processing, and advanced finished product testing methodologies. Furthermore, it elaborates on strategic approaches for innovative formulation development. These strategies focus on meticulous ingredient screening, precise additive adjustment, auxiliary material improvement, and enhanced processing adaptability, ultimately aiming to perfectly balance printing performance, structural fidelity, and consumer safety. The comprehensive study demonstrates that implementing full-chain risk assessment protocols and targeted formulation optimization are absolutely critical to ensuring the commercial viability and sustainable development of 3D printed food technology in the modern food industry.

References

1. Sahlstrøm, S., Bævre, A. B., and Bråthen, E., "Impact of starch properties on hearth bread characteristics. I. Starch in wheat flour," Journal of Cereal Science, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 275-284, 2003.

2. Bi, S., Pi, J., Chen, H., Zhou, Y., Liu, R., Chen, Y., et al., "Research landscape and trending topics on 3D food printing–a bibliometric review," Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1693-1706, 2024.

3. Mantihal, S., Prakash, S., Godoi, F. C., and Bhandari, B., "Optimization of chocolate 3D printing by correlating thermal and flow properties with 3D structure modeling," Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, vol. 44, pp. 21-29, 2017.

4. Hill, K., and Rhode, O., "Sugar‐based surfactants for consumer products and technical applications," Lipid/Fett, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 25-33, 1999.

5. Ingram, L., "Changes in lipid composition of Escherichia coli resulting from growth with organic solvents and with food additives," Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1233-1236, 1977.

6. Hesseltine, C. W., "Natural occurrence of mycotoxins in cereals," Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 141-153, 1974.

7. Gayler, T., Sas, C., and Kalnikaite, V., "Material food probe: Personalized 3D printed flavors for emotional communication in intimate relationships," in Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pp. 965-978, July 2020.

8. Polatoglu, K., "‘Chemotypes’–a fact that should not be ignored in natural product studies," The Natural Products Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 10-14, 2013.

9. Hsu, C. C., Chen, H. C., Huang, K. K., and Huang, Y. M., "A personalized auxiliary material recommendation system based on learning style on Facebook applying an artificial bee colony algorithm," Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1506-1513, 2012.

10. Chang, B. S., and Hershenson, S., "Practical approaches to protein formulation development," in Rational Design of Stable Protein Formulations: Theory and Practice, pp. 1-25, 2002.

11. Stoessel, F., Thermal Safety of Chemical Processes: Risk Assessment and Process Design. John Wiley & Sons, 2021.

12. Tran, J. L., "3D-printed food," Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, vol. 17, pp. 855, 2016.

13. Song, D., Chen, X., Wang, M., Wu, Z., and Xiao, X., "3D-printed flexible sensors for food monitoring," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 474, pp. 146011, 2023.

14. Tran, J. L., "Safety and labelling of 3D printed food," in Fundamentals of 3D Food Printing and Applications, Academic Press, pp. 355-371, 2019.

15. Baiano, A., "3D printed foods: A comprehensive review on technologies, nutritional value, safety, consumer attitude, regulatory framework, and economic and sustainability issues," Food Reviews International, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 986-1016, 2022.

16. Portanguen, S., Tournayre, P., Sicard, J., Astruc, T., and Mirade, P. S., "Toward the design of functional foods and biobased products by 3D printing: A review," Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 86, pp. 188-198, 2019.

17. Agron, D. J. S., and Kim, W. S., "3D printing technology: role in safeguarding food security," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 96, no. 11, pp. 4333-4342, 2024.