Research on International Layout and Regional Brand IP Construction of China's Ceramic Industry under the RCEP Framework

Mengting Jin

doi:10.71222/6den8172

Authors

Mengting Jin School of Information and Artificial Intelligence, Anhui Business College, Wuhu, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/6den8172

Keywords:

rcep, ceramic industry, international trade, brand management, intellectual property, regional development

Abstract

The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) creates unprecedented opportunities for China's ceramic industry to expand its global presence and strengthen regional brand influence within an integrated Asia-Pacific market. However, intensified market competition, heterogeneous consumer preferences, cultural differences, and persistent challenges in intellectual property protection continue to constrain strategic internationalisation. This paper examines how the RCEP framework can support China's ceramic industry in designing an effective international layout and constructing distinctive regional brand intellectual property (IP). By integrating trade policy analysis, market positioning strategies, and brand IP management, the study develops a comprehensive analytical framework to guide enterprises and industrial clusters in leveraging tariff reductions, rules of origin, and trade facilitation measures. Case studies of representative ceramic clusters, including Jingdezhen and Foshan, are used to illustrate how institutional advantages, cultural branding, design innovation, and IP protection mechanisms jointly contribute to competitive positioning and value upgrading. The research further discusses the coordination between industrial policy, regional cooperation, and enterprise-level branding strategies under RCEP. The findings highlight the synergy between international trade liberalisation and cultural brand building in enhancing the global competitiveness, value chain status, and sustainable development capacity of China's ceramic industry, and provide policy and managerial implications for other traditional manufacturing sectors seeking regional brand IP construction.

References

1. S. Samadilashkariani and J. Engström, "Navigating digital transformation in cultural organizations: Balancing authenticity, tradition, and innovation," in Complexity and Emergence in Market Ecosystems, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 187-209.

2. Azuma, R., and Bishop, G., "Improving static and dynamic registration in an optical see-through HMD," in *Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques*, July 1994, pp. 197-204.

3. F. Barnes and D. M. Higgins, "Brand image, cultural association and marketing: ‘New Zealand’ butter and lamb exports to Britain, c. 1920–1938," in The Brand and Its History, Routledge, 2022, pp. 278-305.

4. D. V. Opstal, "The resilient economy: integrating competitiveness and security," Council on Competitiveness, 2009.

5. S. Basu Das, "The Political Economy of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreements: An ASEAN Perspective," ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore, 2014.

6. C. Wang, "Study on the prospects for the development of China, Japan and Korea Economic and Trade Cooperation under RCEP," in SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 163, p. 03035, EDP Sciences, 2023.

7. A. Kuno, Y. Fukunaga, and F. Kimura, "6 Pursuing a consolidated tariff structure in the RCEP," ASEAN and Regional Free Trade Agreements, p. 149, 2015.

8. X. Wu, C. C. Yong, and S. T. Lee, "Addressing the COVID-19 shock: The potential job creation in China by the RCEP," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 23, p. 15669, 2022.

9. D. Ling and K. Qian, "Research on the impact of RCEP rules of origin on China’s manufacturing industry," in SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 169, p. 01010, EDP Sciences, 2023.

10. Z. Jia and X. Yang, "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Assessment of the role of renewable energy financing and information and communication technology in carbon neutrality: evidence from RCEP economies," Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 33636-33649, 2023.

11. M. Perera, "Sri Lanka’s Path to Economic Integration: An assessment of Efforts at Regionalism and the Prospects of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)," 2024.

12. N. Rahman and K. Sharma, "Exploring the impact of RCEP on Malaysia: insights from select manufacturing industries," Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 23-36, 2024.

13. M. Zhang and R. Li, "From Bilateral Trade to Supply Chain Integration: Evolving Patterns of Malaysia–China Economic Relations," in MALAYSIA–CHINA RELATIONS: Progress, Partnership, Prospects, pp. 83-107, 2025.

14. [Online]

15. A. Kohpaiboon and J. Jongwanich, "Restrictiveness of RCEP rules of origin: implications for global value chains in East Asia," Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, Indonesia, 2022.

16. I. A. N. Azalie, "Blue governmentalities and blue economy development: Leveraging small state economy with China via the regional comprehensive economic partnership (RCEP)," in Securing Sustainable Futures Through Blue and Green Economies, IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025, pp. 105-148.

17. L. Yang and P. Kumarasinghe, "Analysis of the impact of RCEP on the industrial and innovation chains of China’s textile and clothing industry," PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 8, p. e0309708, 2024.