Influencing Factors and Intervention Strategies of Early Mathematical Cognition

Xiaoying Cui

doi:10.71222/yxbprq39

Authors

Xiaoying Cui The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/yxbprq39

Keywords:

early mathematics, cognitive development, family environment, parental behavior, digital resources, educational intervention

Abstract

Early mathematical cognition constitutes a critical foundation for children’s subsequent academic achievement and broader cognitive development. Its growth is shaped by multiple interacting factors, including the family environment, parental beliefs and behaviors, school experiences, and the increasing presence of digital resources in children’s daily lives. With the rapid popularization of information technology and the transformation of family education models, clarifying the mechanisms through which these factors operate has important theoretical and practical significance. This review synthesizes major theoretical perspectives on early mathematical cognition, such as number sense, spatial reasoning, and logical thinking, and summarizes empirical findings on how family learning atmosphere, parent–child interaction, and guided use of digital tools support these core abilities. Particular attention is given to the complementary roles of family-based activities and digital learning platforms, which together can enrich children’s opportunities for mathematical exploration and practice. The review further discusses intervention strategies at the levels of parents, schools, and communities, including parental education programs, guidance on the selection and use of digital resources, curriculum optimization, and multi-agency collaboration. Current research is limited by a predominance of cross-sectional designs, insufficient longitudinal and causal evidence, and a lack of attention to cultural and socioeconomic diversity. Future studies should adopt diversified, long-term, and cross-cultural approaches to refine evidence-based interventions and promote the sustainable development and wider dissemination of high-quality early mathematics education.

References

1. S. Chess and A. Thomas, "Origins and evolution of behavior disorders: From infancy to early adult life," Harvard University Press, 1987.

2. C. N. Toneis, "The act of playing and the logical and mathematical reasoning in digital games: The mathematical experience in the digital games," Entertainment Computing, vol. 18, pp. 93-102, 2017.

3. N. Chien, V. Harbin, S. Goldhagen, L. Lippman, and K. E. Walker, "Encouraging the development of key life skills in elementary school-age children: A literature review and recommendations to the Tauck Family Foundation," Child Trends, vol. 28, pp. 1-11, 2012.

4. W. Huitt and J. Hummel, "Piaget's theory of cognitive development," Educational Psychology Interactive, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1-5, 2003.

5. C. J. Dunst, C. M. Trivette, D. W. Hamby, and M. B. Bruder, "Influences of contrasting natural learning environment experiences on child, parent and family well-being," Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 235-250, 2006.

6. K. Sedighian and M. M. Klawe, "An interface strategy for promoting reflective cognition in children," in Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Apr. 1996, pp. 177-178.

7. S. J. Baloyiannis, "Psychological interactions between the members of the family," ENCEPHALOS-ATHENS, vol. 44, no. 4, p. 208, 2007.

8. R. Van Eck, "The effect of contextual pedagogical advisement and competition on middle-school students’ attitude toward mathematics using a computer-based simulation game," Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 165-195, 2006.

9. J. Halberda, R. Ly, J. B. Wilmer, D. Q. Naiman, and L. Germine, "Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, no. 28, pp. 11116-11120, 2012.

10. A. Martin and J. Grudziecki, "DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development," Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 249-267, 2006.

11. H. P. Ginsburg, J. S. Lee, and J. S. Boyd, "Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it," Child Policy Nexus, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 2008.

12. T. N. Cristofaro and C. S. Tamis-LeMonda, "Mother-child conversations at 36 months and at pre-kindergarten: Relations to children's school readiness," Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 68-97, 2012.

13. J. Grant, "Learning needs assessment: assessing the need," BMJ, vol. 324, no. 7330, pp. 156-159, 2002.

14. A. R. Taylor, "Transforming pre-service teachers' understandings of mathematics: Dialogue, Bakhtin and open-mindedness," Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 333-344, 2003.

15. S. Duong, H. J. Bachman, E. Votruba-Drzal, and M. E. Libertus, "What’s in a question? Parents’ question use in dyadic interactions and the relation to preschool-aged children’s math abilities," Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol. 211, p. 105213, 2021.

16. I. Saitadze and M. Lalayants, "Mechanisms that mitigate the effects of child poverty and improve children's cognitive and social–emotional development: A systematic review," Child & Family Social Work, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 289-308, 2021.

17. S. M. Giveon, N. Liberman, S. Klang, and E. Kahan, "A survey of primary care physicians’ perceptions of their patients’ use of complementary medicine," Complementary Therapies in Medicine, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 254-260, 2003.

18. C. Aubrey and R. Godfrey, "The development of children's early numeracy through Key Stage 1," British Educational Research Journal, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 821-840, 2003.

19. S. M. Graham, "The use of diagnostic systems for tuberculosis in children," The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 334-339, 2011.