Can Cross-Industry Marketing Improve Corporate Performance?- A Case Study of the Co-Branding Collaboration Between CHAGEE and Nezha 2

Authors

  • Xianqin Huang Rady School of management of UC San Diego, San Diego, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/70mf0730

Keywords:

cross-border marketing, co-branding, attention capture, emotional transfer, social currency, corporate performance

Abstract

Cross-border marketing has emerged as a pivotal strategy in brand promotion. However, its actual impact on corporate performance remains a subject of debate. Drawing upon the collaborative partnership between CHAGEE and the film "Nezha 2" as a case study, this paper systematically examines the impact of cross-industry marketing on corporate performance across four key dimensions-sales, communication, branding, and user engagement. The findings reveal the following: First, the impact of cross-industry marketing on corporate performance varies significantly across different dimensions-communication performance demonstrates the most outstanding results; sales performance experiences a short-term explosive surge; and both brand and customer performance achieve steady improvements, albeit with limited long-term sustainability. Second, three core mechanisms underpin the influence of cross-industry marketing on corporate performance: the "Attention Capture" mechanism, the "Emotional Transfer" mechanism, and the "Social Currency" mechanism. These three mechanisms correspond respectively to the consumer psychological progression of "See - Like - Share," thereby forming a complete closed loop ranging from traffic acquisition to brand building and, finally, to user-driven virality. Third, the efficacy of cross-industry marketing is highly contingent upon the degree of alignment between the brand and the IP, as well as the quality of campaign execution. This paper elucidates the intrinsic logic behind value creation in cross-industry marketing and provides practical insights for brand managers-encouraging them to adopt a rational perspective on performance returns, prioritize the strategic alignment between brands and IPs, and design co-branding campaigns that encompass the entire value chain.

References

1. S. Paschina, "Brand Equity Measurement Models: A Systematic Review," International Journal of Business and Management, vol. 20, no. 5, 2025.

2. B. Helmig, J. A. Huber, and P. S. Leeflang, "Co-branding: The state of the art," Schmalenbach Business Review, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 359-377, 2008.

3. H. Górska-Warsewicz, "Relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, innovative co-branding partnership, and business performance," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 139-159, 2024.

4. S. Srinivasan and D. M. Hanssens, "The Impact of Advertising On a Company’s Stock Price: Conditions for Positive, Neutral, Negative, And Reverse Effects," Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 120-134, 2024.

5. I. Ascani and C. Ancillai, "Social media marketing and performance measurement: does it take two to tango?," Review of Managerial Science, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 775-823, 2026.

6. B. L. Simonin and J. A. Ruth, "Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes," Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 30-42, 1998.

7. J. Singh, "Negative spill over effects in brand alliance crises," Public Relations Review, vol. 49, no. 5, p. 102394, 2023.

8. W. Zhu, S. Kumar, and V. Mookerjee, "Coordination in multibrand, multimedia advertising: is it always a good thing?," Information Systems Research, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1011-1033, 2024.

9. Y. Xu, "Construction of Marketing Management Performance Evaluation Model Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD), vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-27, 2025.

10. A. Nygaard and R. Dahlstrom, "Better together? How evolution of co-branding alliance affects performance," Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1899-1910, 2023.

11. J. He, J. Hu, and F. Zhang, "How customer community engagement and employee dynamic learning capability impact service performance through customization? A firm–customer synergistic perspective," Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 246-267, 2025.

12. M. Ingendahl, L. Brückner, and T. Vogel, "Beyond affect transfer: attribute associations in video-game brand placements and their impact on brand attitudes," Journal of Advertising, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 586-596, 2025.

13. L. Lobschat, M. A. Zinnbauer, F. Pallas, and E. Joachimsthaler, "Why social currency becomes a key driver of a firm's brand equity–insights from the automotive industry," Long Range Planning, vol. 46, no. 1-2, pp. 125-148, 2013.

14. C. Lou and Q. Xie, "Something social, something entertaining? How digital content marketing augments consumer experience and brand loyalty," International Journal of Advertising, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 376-402, 2021.

15. J. K. Saint Clair and M. Cunha Jr, "When learning negative brand associations leads to positive evaluations of effectiveness," Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 497-519, 2024.

Downloads

Published

02 August 2026

How to Cite

Huang, X. (2026). Can Cross-Industry Marketing Improve Corporate Performance?- A Case Study of the Co-Branding Collaboration Between CHAGEE and Nezha 2. Pinnacle Academic Press Proceedings Series, 12, 11-25. https://doi.org/10.71222/70mf0730