Identification of Sensor Fault Characteristics Based on Adaptive Kernel Principal Component Analysis

Authors

  • Ziyang Xie Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, China Author

Keywords:

Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA), fault detection, contribution analysis, sensor fault diagnosis

Abstract

With the ongoing advancement of industrial automation towards higher levels of intelligence, such as increased use of machine learning and artificial intelligence for process optimization, multidimensional monitoring and real-time fault diagnosis of complex industrial processes have emerged as critical challenges for ensuring the reliable operation of production systems and the consistent quality of products. Among multivariate statistical process monitoring approaches, conventional Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is inherently constrained by its linear projection mechanism, leading to significant performance degradation when addressing process data exhibiting nonlinear characteristics. To overcome this limitation, this study proposes an Adaptive Kernel Principal Component Analysis (AKPCA) method based on kernel space mapping. By utilizing Mercer kernel functions, the original process data is nonlinearly mapped into a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS), thereby enhancing the separability of nonlinear features. Furthermore, a two-tier fault diagnosis framework is established: the first tier employs an adaptive KPCA model integrated with a sliding window mechanism for fault detection, while the second tier utilizes a Contribution Analysis (CA) algorithm for fault source identification. To validate the robustness of the proposed method, we simulate four representative types of faults — bias faults, complete failures, offset faults, and precision degradation. Experimental results substantiate that the adaptive KPCA approach not only accurately detects faults but also effectively localizes fault sources through contribution analysis.

References

1. X. Wang, U. Kruger, and G. W. Irwin, "Process monitoring approach using fast moving window PCA," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 44, no. 15, pp. 5691–5702, 2005, doi: 10.1021/ie048873f.

2. A. AlGhazzawi and B. Lennox, "Monitoring a complex refining process using multivariate statistics," Control Eng. Pract., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 294–307, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2007.04.014.

3. C. Zhao, F. Wang, N. Lu, and M. Jia, "Stage-based soft-transition multiple PCA modeling and on-line monitoring strategy for batch processes," J. Process Control, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 728–741, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2007.02.005.

4. M. M. Rashid and J. Yu, "Nonlinear and non-Gaussian dynamic batch process monitoring using a new multiway kernel inde-pendent component analysis and multidimensional mutual information-based dissimilarity approach," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 51, no. 33, pp. 10910–10920, 2012, doi: 10.1021/ie301002h.

5. Q. Jiang and X. Yan, "Chemical processes monitoring based on weighted principal component analysis and its application," Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 119, pp. 11–20, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.09.002.

6. U. Kruger, Q. Chen, D. J. Sandoz, and R. C. McFarlane, "Extended PLS approach for enhanced condition monitoring of indus-trial processes," AIChE J., vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2076–2091, 2001, doi: 10.1002/aic.690470918.

7. T. E. Morud, "Multivariate statistical process control; example from the chemical process industry," J. Chemom., vol. 10, no. 5–6, pp. 669–675, 1996, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199609)10:5/6<669::AID-CEM467>3.0.CO;2-Q.

8. S. J. Zhao, J. Zhang, and Y. M. Xu, "Performance monitoring of processes with multiple operating modes through multiple PLS models," J. Process Control, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 763–772, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2005.12.002.

9. C. Chouaib, H. Mohamed-Faouzi, and D. Messaoud, "Adaptive kernel principal component analysis for nonlinear dynamic process monitoring," in Proc. 9th Asian Control Conf. (ASCC), Istanbul, Turkey, 2013, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/ASCC.2013.6606291.

10. W. Ku, R. H. Storer, and C. Georgakis, "Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis," Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 179–196, 1995, doi: 10.1016/0169-7439(95)00076-3.

11. G. Rätsch, T. Onoda, and K. R. Müller, "Soft margins for AdaBoost," Mach. Learn., vol. 42, pp. 287–320, 2001, doi: 10.1023/A:1007618119488.

Downloads

Published

16 May 2025

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Xie, Z. (2025). Identification of Sensor Fault Characteristics Based on Adaptive Kernel Principal Component Analysis. European Journal of Engineering and Technologies, 1(1), 7-15. https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/EJET/article/view/94