Reconceptualising Business English Curriculum through AI Literacy: A Critical Examination of Pedagogical Gaps and Curriculum Transformation in Higher Education

Authors

  • Mengxian Ou Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom Author
  • Yao Chen Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/bd27bt98

Keywords:

artificial intelligence literacy, business english pedagogy, curriculum transformation, digital competence, educational innovation, workplace communication

Abstract

The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed communication practices, professional expectations, and knowledge production in contemporary workplaces. These changes create new demands for higher education, particularly for Business English programmes that aim to prepare students for participation in global professional environments. However, current Business English curricula often remain grounded in conventional language-training models and fail to address AI literacy in a systematic and critical way. This paper critically examines the limitations of existing Business English curriculum design in relation to AI literacy and argues that the problem is not simply the absence of new content, but a deeper mismatch between curriculum knowledge, pedagogy, and workplace realities. Drawing on scholarship in AI literacy, English for Specific Purposes (ESP), and curriculum theory, the study identifies three interrelated problems: conceptual ambiguity surrounding AI literacy, pedagogical conservatism in Business English teaching, and insufficient alignment between curriculum materials and AI-mediated workplace communication. The paper proposes a reconceptualised framework for integrating AI literacy into Business English education through epistemic restructuring, pedagogical innovation, and socio-institutional collaboration. It argues that AI literacy should not be reduced to technical tool use, but understood as a critical, ethical, and communicative competence. The study contributes to debates on digital transformation in higher education by demonstrating how Business English curriculum reform can respond more effectively to technological change and global employability demands, while emphasizing the importance of developing students' critical thinking skills and ethical awareness in an AI-driven professional landscape.

References

1. H. Basturkmen, Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Springer, 2015.

2. S. Evans, "Designing tasks for the business English classroom," ELT Journal, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 281-293, 2013.

3. O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, and F. Gouverneur, "Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?," International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 39, 2019.

4. D. D. Belcher, English for specific purposes in theory and practice, 2009.

5. N. Selwyn, Should robots replace teachers?: AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

6. K. Hyland, "English for specific purposes: Some influences and impacts," in Second Handbook of English Language Teaching, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 337-353.

7. M. Young and J. Muller, Curriculum and the specialization of knowledge: Studies in the sociology of education. Routledge, 2015.

8. R. Luckin and W. Holmes, Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education, 2016.

9. D. Long and B. Magerko, "What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations," in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020, pp. 1-16.

10. M. Cukurova and F. Miao, AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO Publishing, 2024.

11. B. Williamson, Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice, 2017.

12. B. Tomlinson, "Materials development for language learning and teaching," Language Teaching, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 143-179, 2012.

13. J. W. Thomas, A review of research on project-based learning, 2000.

14. M. Prince, "Does active learning work? A review of the research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004.

15. W. Holmes, M. Bialik, and C. Fadel, Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign, 2019.

16. M. Taguma and M. Barrera, OECD future of education and skills 2030: Curriculum analysis, 2019.

17. C. A. Taylor and A. Bayley, Eds., Posthumanism and higher education: Reimagining pedagogy, practice and research. Springer, 2019.

18. T. Sarı, F. Nayir, and A. Bozkurt, "Reimagining education: Bridging artificial intelligence, transhumanism, and critical pedagogy," Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 102-115, 2024.

19. R. Luckin, "Nurturing human intelligence in the age of AI: rethinking education for the future," Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1-4, 2025.

Downloads

Published

29 March 2026

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Ou, M., & Chen, Y. (2026). Reconceptualising Business English Curriculum through AI Literacy: A Critical Examination of Pedagogical Gaps and Curriculum Transformation in Higher Education. European Journal of Education Science, 2(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.71222/bd27bt98