Sustainable Institutional Internationalization as Pathway to Student Global Competence in a Chinese University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/s4039766Keywords:
Sustainable Internationalization, Global Competence, Intercultural Sensitivity, Communication Proficiency, Global AwarenessAbstract
This study examined the Sustainable Institutional Internationalization Strategies (SIIS) implemented by the university and their relationship to students' Preparation for Global Competence (PGC). A quantitative survey was conducted across different demographics (sex, year level, academic major) to assess students' views on internationalization and readiness for global engagement. Results showed that students generally agreed on the strategic implementation of SIIS, with Reflexive Policy Frameworks and Environmental Sustainability receiving the highest ratings. Students felt prepared for global competence, particularly in Intercultural Sensitivity and Civic Responsibility, though Global Awareness posed more challenges. No significant demographic differences in SIIS and PGC were found, except for a slight sex-based difference in Communication Proficiency. Correlation analysis revealed weak, negative correlations between SIIS and PGC, suggesting that institutional strategies alone may not be sufficient to enhance students' global competence. The study emphasizes the need for stronger curriculum integration, discipline-specific global learning, and sustained intercultural engagement, offering practical recommendations for enhancing global competence development in higher education.References
1. Asia Society, Teaching for global competence in a rapidly changing world, Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2018. ISBN: 9789264289024.
2. H. De Wit, "Everything that quacks is internationalization-Critical reflections on the evolution of higher education internationalization," Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3-14, 2024. doi: 10.1177/10283153231221655.
3. H. Idrissi, L. Engel, and K. Pashby, "The diversity conflation and action ruse: A critical discourse analysis of the OECD's framework for global competence," Comparative and International Education, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 2020. doi: 10.5206/cie-eci.v49i1.13435.
4. E. Auld and P. Morris, "Science by streetlight and the OECD’s measure of global competence: A new yardstick for internationalisation?," Policy Futures in Education, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 677–698, 2019. doi: 10.1177/1478210318819246.
5. X. Hu, and J. Hu, "A classification analysis of the high and low levels of global competence of secondary students: Insights from 25 countries/regions," Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 19, p. 11053, 2021. doi: 10.3390/su131911053.
6. E. Koenig, K. Guertler, D. Żarnowska, and J. Horbačauskienė, "Developing English language competence for global engineers," In 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), April, 2020, pp. 242-249. doi: 10.1109/educon45650.2020.9125208.
7. D. J. Cobb, and D. Couch, "Teacher education for an uncertain future: Implications of PISA's global competence," In Teacher education in and for uncertain times, 2018, pp. 35-47. ISBN: 9789811086472.
8. C. Sälzer, and N. Roczen, "Assessing global competence in PISA 2018: Challenges and approaches to capturing a complex construct," International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, vol. 10, no. 1, 2018. doi: 10.18546/ijdegl.10.1.02.
9. S. T. Wren, "Improving Emirati students' social responsibility competence through global citizenship education," Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 80-94, 2021. doi: 10.1108/lthe-09-2020-0046.
10. A. S. Hofmeyr, "Intercultural competence development through cocurricular and extracurricular at-home programs in Japan," Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 363-386, 2023. doi: 10.1177/10283153211070110.
11. B. Ates et al., Promoting global competence and social justice in teacher education: Successes and challenges within local and international contexts, London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, 2015. ISBN: 9781498504355.
12. I. Ortiz-Marcos et al., "A framework of global competence for engineers: The need for a sustainable world," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 22, p. 9568, 2020. doi: 10.3390/su12229568.
13. H. De Wit, "Internationalization in higher education, a critical review," SFU Educational Review, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 9-17, 2019. doi: 10.21810/sfuer.v12i3.1036.
14. H. De Wit, and P. G. Altbach, "Internationalization in higher education: Global trends and recommendations for its future," Policy Reviews in Higher Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 28-46, 2021. doi: 10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898.
15. J. Li, and E. Xue, "Sustainable or unsustainable" in higher education internationalization development: Exploring the post-doctoral system in the humanities and social sciences," Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 17, p. 11024, 2022. doi: 10.3390/su141711024.
16. K. Cushner, and S. Brennan, "Intercultural student teaching: A bridge to global competence," Rowman & Littlefield Education, 2007. ISBN: 9781578865796.
17. J. Li, and E. Xue, "Stakeholders' perspectives on implementing "internationalization at home" for China's international education sustainability: Challenges and strategies," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 247, 2022. doi: 10.3390/su15010247.
18. K. A. Corrales, J. Lombana-Coy, and L. Rey-Paba, "Fostering global competence in international business students on a Latin American campus," Journal of Teaching in International Business, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 81-101, 2021.doi: 10.1080/08975930.2021.1906381.
19. J. V. Cleofas, and C. C. Labayo, "Youth netizens as global citizens: Digital citizenship and global competence among undergraduate students," Frontiers in Communication, vol. 9, p. 1398001, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2024.1398001.
20. L. Bailey, S. Ledger, M. Thier, and C. M. Pitts, "Global competence in PISA 2018: Deconstruction of the measure," Globalisation, Societies and Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 367-376, 2023. doi: 10.1080/14767724.2022.2029693.
21. E. Bruhn-Zass, "Virtual internationalization to support comprehensive internationalization in higher education," Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 240-258, 2022. doi: 10.1177/10283153211052776.
22. M. Cordova et al., "COVID-19 and higher education: Responding to local demands and the consolidation of e-internationalization in Latin American universities," Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 493–509, 2021. doi: 10.1108/arla-01-2021-0020.
23. F. Guo, "Internationalization at home: A sustainable model for Chinese higher education in the post-pandemic era," Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 135-140, 2023. doi: 10.5539/jel.v12n3p135.
24. J. Lannert, and A. Derényi, "Internationalization in Hungarian higher education: Recent developments and factors of reaching better global visibility," Hungarian Educational Research Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 346-369, 2021. doi: 10.1556/063.2020.00034.
25. H. Chandir, and R. Gorur, "Unsustainable measures? Assessing global competence in PISA 2018," Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 29, pp. 122-122, 2021. doi: 10.14507/epaa.29.4716.
26. H. Chandir, "Student responses on the survey of global competence in PISA 2018," Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 526-542, 2022. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2020.1844153.
27. S. Cao, "Effectiveness of collaborative online international learning in university students' global competence," Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 747-747, 2024. doi: 10.56028/aehssr.12.1.747.2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Haochen Liu (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

