A Vertically Integrated Curriculum: Project-Based Learning in Operations Research for Bachelor-Master Continuum Programs

Ling Gai

doi:10.71222/3apqda97

Authors

Ling Gai Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/3apqda97

Keywords:

Vertically integrated curriculum, project-based learning (PBL), bachelor-master continuum programs, operations research, higher education reform, curriculum design

Abstract

This paper presents and evaluates a vertically integrated, project-based learning (PBL) curriculum design for an Operations Research (OR) course within a Bachelor-Master continuum program. Traditional segmented teaching often leads to disjointed knowledge and redundant learning between undergraduate and postgraduate stages. To address this, we developed a spiral curriculum framework grounded in constructivist and scaffolding theories. The framework employs a sequence of progressively complex, cross- semester projects designed to integrate core algorithmic learning, modeling practice, and frontier research exploration. Implemented in a five-year integrated program (in Information Management and Systems Engineering) at a research-oriented university, the course was assessed using a mixed- methods approach. Data from two cohorts of students (N = 58), including academic performance analysis, project artifact evaluation, surveys, and focus group interviews, were collected. Preliminary results indicate that the curriculum significantly enhances students' advanced modeling capabilities, independent research skills, and sense of academic community. Undergraduates were exposed to research thinking early on, while postgraduates deepened their understanding through mentoring roles. The paper discusses the implications of this moel for facilitating seamless academic transition and cultivating research-ready talent, alongside challenges in scaling implementation, such as faculty coordination and differentiated assessment. This study provides an actionable exemplar for curriculum re- form in STEM-integrated education.

References

1. P. G. Altbach, L. Reisberg, and L. E. Rumbley, "Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution," Brill, vol. 22, 2019.

2. F. S. Hillier, "Introduction to operations research," McGrawHill, 2005.

3. J. Cowan, "Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does," 2000.

4. R. M. Harden, "The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation," MEDICAL EDUCATION-OXFORD-, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 551-557, 2000.

5. F. Ishtiaq, M. A. Zahid, C. J. C. Nagal, F. E. A. Longa, and R. J. F. Calimlim, "THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND LEARNING OUTCOMES," Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1064-1078, 2025.

6. S. A. Forawi, E. J. Al Quraan, and F. A. Abazar, "Factors of STEM Curriculum Integration and Implementation," Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, pp. 1117-1135, 2025.

7. F. Dochy, M. Segers, P. Van den Bossche, and D. Gijbels, "Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis," Learning and instruction, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 533-568, 2003. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4752(02)00025-7

8. A. Walker, and H. Leary, "A problem based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels," Interdisciplinary journal of problem-based learning, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 6, 2009. doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1061

9. V. M. Choque-Soto, V. D. Sosa-Jauregui, and L. E. Rodas, "Enhancing academic performance in operations research through cooperative pbl in a distance learning environment," In Proceedings of the 4th south american international industrial engineering and operations management conference, November, 2023, pp. 48-62.

10. J. Van de Pol, M. Volman, and J. Beishuizen, "Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research," Educational psychology review, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 271-296, 2010.

11. R. D. Roscoe, and M. T. Chi, "Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors' explanations and questions," Review of educational research, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 534-574, 2007.

12. M. Bloch, "Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation," Man, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 487-489, 1994.

13. C. M. Zhao, G. D. Kuh, and R. M. Carini, "A comparison of international student and American student engagement in effective educational practices," The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 209-231, 2005.

14. R. L. Cruess, S. R. Cruess, J. D. Boudreau, L. Snell, and Y. Steinert, "A schematic representation of the professional identity formation and socialization of medical students and residents: a guide for medical educators," Academic Medicine, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 718-725, 2015.

15. J. W. Creswell, and V. L. P. Clark, "Designing and conducting mixed methods research," Sage publications, 2017.