Impact of Modern Pedagogy on Classical Ballet Technique Preservation

Clara Winslow

doi:10.71222/ft5vdn28

Authors

Clara Winslow Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/ft5vdn28

Keywords:

ballet pedagogy, classical technique, modern education, dance preservation, pedagogical innovation, traditional training

Abstract

The preservation of classical ballet technique faces unprecedented challenges in the contemporary educational landscape as modern pedagogical approaches increasingly influence traditional training methodologies. This study examines the complex relationship between progressive educational practices and the maintenance of classical ballet's foundational principles, exploring how contemporary teaching strategies impact the transmission of time-honored techniques while addressing twenty-first-century learning needs. Through comprehensive analysis of current pedagogical trends, this research investigates the tension between innovation and preservation in ballet education, examining how feminist pedagogy, reflective practice, and student-centered approaches affect classical technique instruction. The study reveals that modern pedagogical methods, while enhancing student engagement and critical thinking, present both opportunities and challenges for preserving authentic classical ballet traditions. Findings indicate that successful integration requires careful balance between progressive teaching strategies and adherence to established technical foundations. The research demonstrates that contemporary approaches can strengthen classical training when implemented thoughtfully, but inappropriate application may compromise technique integrity. This investigation provides crucial insights for ballet educators seeking to modernize instruction while maintaining classical standards, offering evidence-based recommendations for sustainable pedagogical evolution in ballet education.

References

1. E. C. Warburton, "Recentering Ballet for Twenty-First-Century Dance Education," Dance Educ. Pract., pp. 2–7, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23734833.2024.2434426.

2. L. Yang, "The Evolution of Ballet Pedagogy: A Study of Traditional and Contemporary Approaches," J. Lit. Arts Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.71222/2nw5qw82.

3. G. Alterowitz, "Toward a Feminist Ballet Pedagogy: Teaching Strategies for Ballet Technique Classes in the Twenty-First Century," J. Dance Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 2014, doi: 10.1080/15290824.2013.824579.

4. N. Rowe, X. Xiong, and H. Tuomeiciren, "Dancing from policy to pedagogy in China: Transgressions, surveillance and re-sistance from students, teachers and institutional leaders," Policy Futures Educ., vol. 18, no. 8, p. 147821032090780, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1478210320907802.

5. Heidi Marian Haraldsen, Bård Erlend Solstad, Danielle, H. Gustafsson, S. M. Nordin-Bates, and C. J. Knight, "An exploration of reciprocity among teacher and students in female pre-professional ballet education: a shared reality theory perspective," Front. Educ., vol. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1148922.

6. O. Cruz Banks, "Critical Postcolonial Dance Pedagogy: The Relevance of West African Dance Education in the United States," Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 18–34, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01065.x.

7. J. Zeller, "Reflective Practice in the Ballet Class: Bringing Progressive Pedagogy to the Classical Tradition," J. Dance Educ., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 99–105, 2017, doi: 10.1080/15290824.2017.1326052.

8. A. Sööt and E. Viskus, "Contemporary Approaches to Dance Pedagogy – The Challenges of the 21st Century," Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 112, pp. 290–299, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1167.

9. D. Mikelli, "Pedagogy of Difference 2.0: Interactive documentary practices and participatory research with young people," Convergence, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 438–457, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1354856520934724.

10. A. Fazio, E. Isidori, and Ó. C. Bartoll, "Teaching Physical Education in English using CLIL Methodology: A Critical Perspec-tive," Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 186, pp. 918–926, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.041.

11. S. Jusslin and H. Höglund, "Arts‐based responses to teaching poetry: a literature review of dance and visual arts in poetry education," Literacy, vol. 55, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1111/lit.12236.