From Shadow to Subject: On the Death and Spiritual Resurrection of Sydney Carton in A Tale of Two Cities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/mgg3mq65Keywords:
victorian literature, charles dickens, subjectivity, humanism, resurrectionAbstract
In the critical tradition surrounding A Tale of Two Cities, Sydney Carton's sacrifice and resurrection have long been framed within the paradigms of Christian typology or Dickensian humanism. While these readings have their validity, they tend to reduce Carton to a passive vehicle of external forces. This paper argues that Carton's death and resurrection embody a distinctive dialectic of subjectivity, understood in the Hegelian-Kojèvean sense as the capacity for self-realisation through recognition and action in the face of negation. Through a comparative analysis of three modes of resurrection in the novel---Dr. Manette's externally salvaged bodily recovery, Darnay's compromised class-based escape, and Carton's autonomous death as spiritual rebirth---the paper demonstrates that Carton's sacrifice is neither a simple imitation of the Christ narrative nor a mere illustration of the author's moral doctrine. Rather, it is the only path through which an individual, caught in profound spiritual paralysis and self-aware impotence, can achieve subjecthood by actively choosing his own death. Carton's "being-toward-death" transforms him from a "shadow" into a subject of autonomous will. Moreover, his personal redemption objectively breaks the cycle of vengeful violence in the novel and enters into a deep interaction with Dickens's humanist ideals. This paper contends that only by reading Carton as a literary subject who makes his own choices---not as a mouthpiece of ideas---can we fully grasp the enduring artistic power and intellectual depth of this character.References
1. Glancy, R. F., "A tale of two cities: Dickens's revolutionary novel."
2. Jones, C., "Metaphorical understanding of Jesus’ resurrection," Verbum et Ecclesia, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 3441, 2025.
3. Moore, G., *Dickens and Empire: Discourses of Class, Race and Colonialism in the Works of Charles Dickens*. Routledge, 2017.
4. Adams, J. E., A history of Victorian literature. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
5. Gan, X., "Relationship between English Literature and Economy in Victorian Era Exemplified in Charles Dickens’s Works," Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, vol. 7, no. 4, 2023.
6. Amigoni, D., Victorian Literature. Edinburgh University Press, 2011.
7. Padra, D. B., *Charles Dickens and the Critique of Victorian Society: Literature as a Catalyst for Social Reform*, 2024.
8. Goodlad, L. M., *Victorian literature and the Victorian state: character and governance in a liberal society*. JHU Press, 2003.
9. Ledger, S., and Furneaux, H., Eds., Charles Dickens in context. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
10. Schwarzbach, F. S., "Victorian Literature and the City: A Review Essay," Dickens Studies Annual, vol. 15, pp. 309-335, 1986.
11. Buckland, A., "“The Poetry of Science”: Charles Dickens, Geology, and Visual and Material Culture in Victorian London," Victorian Literature and Culture, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 679-694, 2007.
12. Rodríguez Rosales, F., "The novel of Charles Dickens as vehicle for ideas that shaped the Victorian Period," 2022.
13. Ericksen, D. H., and Erickson, D. H., "Bleak House and Victorian Art and Illustration: Charles Dickens's Visual Narrative Style," The Journal of Narrative Technique, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 31-46, 1983.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yijia Yuan, Yujie Sun (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

