The Narrative Psychology of Reversal Endings: An Integrated Model Based on Predictive Coding and Narrative Remapping
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/xta9f938Keywords:
narrative reversal, predictive coding, narrative remapping, cognitive dissonance, meaning construction, mental modelsAbstract
Reversal endings are widely celebrated in contemporary narrative across various media, yet existing academic research largely remains confined to the level of basic typological description. Consequently, there is a significant lack of an integrated explanation regarding the underlying psychological and cognitive mechanisms that make these narrative devices so impactful. To address this critical gap, this paper proposes a comprehensive two-stage "predictive coding—narrative remapping" model. In the first stage, the narrative reversal triggers a strong prediction error, leading to the sudden collapse of the viewer's existing mental model and inducing a profound state of cognitive dissonance. In the subsequent second stage, the viewer initiates an active, compensatory reconstruction process termed "narrative remapping." This complex cognitive mechanism integrates retroactive cue retrieval and emotional reappraisal, thereby successfully transforming the original disruptive error signal into profound aesthetic pleasure and enhanced memory durability. Contrary to previous literary studies, this paper argues that the true artistic value of a reversal does not originate merely from the shock of the prediction error itself, but rather from the completability of the remapping process and the subsequent emotional return on cognitive investment. Through detailed close readings of the acclaimed films Shutter Island (2010) and The Piano Tuner (2010), together with a rigorous comparative analysis of a structurally failed case, Old (2021), the paper validates the proposed theoretical model. Finally, three empirically testable hypotheses are offered, charting a robust methodological path for future investigations in the emerging field of cognitive neuro-narratology.References
1. E. Aronson, "The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective," in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 4, Academic Press, 1969, pp. 1-34.
2. M. Kiss, Impossible Puzzle Films: A Cognitive Approach to Contemporary Complex Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.
3. R. Gerrig, Experiencing Narrative Worlds. London: Routledge, 2018.
4. J. M. Zacks, Flicker: Your Brain on Movies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
5. D. Bordwell, Narration in the Fiction Film. London: Routledge, 2013.
6. N. Carroll, Theorizing the Moving Image. 1996, pp. xix+-426.
7. A. Clark, "Extending the predictive mind," Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 119-130, 2024.
8. K. Friston, "The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory?," Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 127-138, 2010.
9. A. Clark, "Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science," Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 181-204, 2013.
10. A. M. Duckworth, The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. 1979.
11. S. Knight, M. D. Rocklage, and Y. Bart, "Narrative reversals and story success," Science Advances, vol. 10, no. 34, p. eadl2013, 2024.
12. K. D. Kandylaki, A. Nagels, S. Tune, T. Kircher, R. Wiese, M. Schlesewsky, and I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, "Predicting 'when' in discourse engages the human dorsal auditory stream: An fMRI study using naturalistic stories," Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 36, no. 48, pp. 12180-12191, 2016.
13. G. Pezzulo, "Why do you fear the bogeyman? An embodied predictive coding model of perceptual inference," Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 902-911, 2014.
14. A. D. Shaw, R. L. Sumner, and L. C. Berndt, "Predictive coding and neurocomputational psychiatry: A mechanistic framework for understanding mental disorders," Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 16, p. 1713833, 2025.
15. M. Andersen, "Predictive coding in agency detection," Religion, Brain & Behavior, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 65-84, 2019.
16. J. Hohwy, A. Roepstorff, and K. Friston, "Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review," Cognition, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 687-701, 2008.
17. R. M. Gordon, "Simulation, predictive coding, and the shared world," in The Neural Basis of Mentalizing, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 237-255.
18. A. H. Sinclair, G. M. Manalili, I. K. Brunec, R. A. Adcock, and M. D. Barense, "Prediction errors disrupt hippocampal representations and update episodic memories," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118, no. 51, p. e2117625118, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Honghu Mao (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

