Mongolian Fire Worship Education in the 21st Century: Preservation, Transformation, and Digital Integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/zy263241Keywords:
Mongolian fire worship, cultural heritage education, preservation, digital integration, hybrid pedagogy, intangible cultural heritageAbstract
Mongolian fire worship, a vital component of Mongolia’s intangible cultural heritage, has historically served as both a spiritual practice and an educational medium, transmitting ethical values, social norms, and cultural knowledge across generations. In the 21st century, this tradition faces significant challenges due to urbanization, declining youth participation, and limited institutional support, which threaten its continuity. Concurrently, modern educational initiatives and digital technologies offer innovative pathways for preserving, transforming, and disseminating fire worship practices. This review synthesizes research on Mongolian fire worship education, examining historical origins, traditional pedagogical roles, contemporary preservation strategies, educational transformations, and the integration of digital tools such as virtual and augmented reality, online repositories, and social media platforms. The analysis highlights the complementary nature of preservation, transformation, and digital integration, emphasizing the need to balance authenticity with accessibility, pedagogical innovation, and technological engagement. The review concludes with recommendations for policymakers, educators, and digital developers, as well as future research directions, including longitudinal studies, cross-cultural comparisons, and AI-assisted cultural preservation. By combining traditional practice with modern educational and digital approaches, Mongolian fire worship can remain a dynamic and meaningful component of cultural education, fostering intergenerational knowledge transmission, national identity, and global cultural awareness.
References
1. A. N. Bitkeeva and S. D. Gympilova, “Ritual folklore of Mongolian peoples in education,” in Proceedings of INTCESS, 8th ed., 2021.
2. E. Gombo-Ochir, T. Molnár, and T. Gantumur, “The architectural evolution of Mongolian temples,” Pollack Periodica, 2025.
3. N. Tugjamba, G. Walkerden, and F. Miller, “Under the guidance of the eternal blue sky: Cultural ecosystem services that support well-being in Mongolian pastureland,” Landscape Research, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 713–727, 2021.
4. Z. Huang and K. Noknoi, “The application of Chinese folk ritual dance in teaching: The integration of cultural identity inheritance and innovative education,” International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 460–468, 2025.
5. L. Yi and L. Y. Ling, “Embodied heritage and cultural memory: A comparative study of Oroqen, Evenki, and Daur dance traditions in Inner Mongolia,” Journal of Integrated Social Sciences and Humanities, pp. 1–9, 2025.
6. J. J. Long, Facing the Fire, Taking the Stage: Ritual, Performance, and Belonging in Buryat Communities of Siberia. Bloomington, IN, USA: Indiana University Press, 2025.
7. D. Chuluunii and E. O. Dalai, A History of Mongolian Shamanism. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2022.
8. B. Dondukov, “Public discourse of Buddhist leaders in the context of forest fires in the Republic of Buryatia, Russia,” The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 131, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 AL IMA (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

