Neurodevelopmental Screening for Autism: EEG-Driven Deep Learning in Early Childhood

Authors

  • Hanwen Yuan Redmond High School, WA, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/fz2hyy28

Keywords:

Autism Spectrum Disorder, electroencephalography, event-related potentials, P100, N100, P300, visual oddball paradigm, machine learning

Abstract

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by atypical patterns of communication, social interaction, and behavior. The prevalence of ASD has risen sharply in recent decades, with recent estimates indicating that approximately one in every thirty-six children in the United States is diagnosed. Early diagnosis is crucial because interventions initiated during early childhood-when neural plasticity is greatest-can substantially improve behavioral, cognitive, and linguistic outcomes. However, since current diagnostic practices largely rely on behavioral assessments, symptoms often remain undetected until around three years of age. This underscores the urgent need for objective biological markers capable of identifying ASD risk earlier, ideally during infancy or toddlerhood. Previous research has demonstrated that ASD is associated with atypical event-related potential (ERP) responses across both early and late stages of cognitive processing. Nevertheless, few studies have explored whether such ERP features can support reliable individual-level predictions using modern machine learning (ML) approaches, and even fewer have applied systematic validation procedures. Addressing this gap, the present study employs multiple ML frameworks-particularly a multilayer perceptron (MLP)-to classify ERP features derived from a visual oddball paradigm. Model performance was rigorously evaluated using cross-validation at the single-subject level. The MLP achieved an overall accuracy of 0.746, with a precision of 0.72, recall of 0.736, and an F1 score of 0.734, demonstrating that the model effectively distinguished ERP feature patterns between ASD and typically developing participants.

References

1. S. Wang, C. Yang, Y. Liu, Z. Shao, and T. Jackson, "Early and late stage processing abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders: An ERP study," PloS one, vol. 12, no. 5, p. e0178542, 2017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178542

2. T. M. Heunis, C. Aldrich, and P. J. de Vries, "Recent advances in resting-state electroencephalography biomarkers for autism spectrum disorder-a review of methodological and clinical challenges," Pediatric neurology, vol. 61, pp. 28-37, 2016.

3. W. J. Bosl, H. Tager-Flusberg, and C. A. Nelson, "EEG analytics for early detection of autism spectrum disorder: a data-driven approach," Scientific reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 6828, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24318-x

4. Z. Sharifi Mehrjard, H. Momeni, and H. Adabi Ardekani, "A review of machine learning algorithms to diagnose autism using the EEG signal," Soft Computing Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 2-19, 2024.

5. W. Jamal, S. Das, I. A. Oprescu, K. Maharatna, F. Apicella, and F. Sicca, "Classification of autism spectrum disorder using supervised learning of brain connectivity measures extracted from synchrostates," Journal of neural engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 046019, 2014.

6. S. M. Hasan, M. P. Uddin, M. Al Mamun, M. I. Sharif, A. Ulhaq, and G. Krishnamoorthy, "A machine learning framework for early-stage detection of autism spectrum disorders," IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 15038-15057, 2022.

Downloads

Published

12 November 2025

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Yuan, H. (2025). Neurodevelopmental Screening for Autism: EEG-Driven Deep Learning in Early Childhood. European Journal of AI, Computing & Informatics, 1(3), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.71222/fz2hyy28