How Charity Involvement Influences the Effects of Beneficiary's Facial Images in Charitable Advertising
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/wdk3d488Keywords:
facial expression, gaze direction, involvement, prosocial behavior, charitable advertisingAbstract
This study examines how beneficiaries' facial expressions and gaze direction in charitable advertising interact with individuals' levels of charity involvement to influence emotional and behavioral responses among potential donors. Using a 2 (facial expression: positive vs. negative) × 2 (gaze direction: direct vs. averted) × 2 (charity involvement: high vs. low) between-subjects experimental design, the research tests both main and interaction effects on empathy, emotional arousal, and helping intentions. The findings show that facial expressions and gaze direction do not significantly affect donor responses unless charity involvement is considered as a moderator. For individuals with low charity involvement, advertisements depicting beneficiaries with negative facial expressions elicit stronger empathy and greater helping intentions than those with positive expressions. Similarly, direct eye contact more effectively induces emotional arousal and motivates helping behavior among these individuals, suggesting that vivid and confronting visual cues are particularly influential for less engaged audiences. In contrast, facial expressions and gaze direction have no significant effect on individuals with high charity involvement, who may rely more on stable values or prior commitments than on specific visual cues. These results emphasize the moderating role of charity involvement in determining the impact of visual elements in charitable advertising. The study advances research on charitable communication by highlighting the need to align visual strategies with donor characteristics and offers practical guidance for nonprofit organizations seeking to design more effective, segment-specific campaigns.References
1. X. Cao and L. Jia, "The effects of the facial expression of beneficiaries in charity appeals and psychological involvement on donation intentions: Evidence from an online experiment," Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 457-473, 2017.
2. G. Buskila and D. Perez, "The impact of victims’ imagery on charity crowdfunding campaigns: how photos of victims doing nothing to help themselves elicit fewer donations," Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 385-396, 2022.
3. R. Bennett, "Impulsive donation decisions during online browsing of charity websites," Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, vol. 8, no. 2‐3, pp. 116-134, 2009.
4. R. Bennett, "Individual characteristics and the arousal of mixed emotions: Consequences for the effectiveness of charity fundraising advertisements," International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 188-209, 2015.
5. J. C. Chebat, C. G. Chebat, and D. Vaillant, "Environmental background music and in-store selling," Journal of Business Research, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 115-123, 2001.
6. H. Akechi, A. Senju, H. Uibo, Y. Kikuchi, T. Hasegawa, and J. K. Hietanen, "Attention to eye contact in the West and East: Autonomic responses and evaluative ratings," PloS one, vol. 8, no. 3, e59312, 2013.
7. C. Bebko, L. M. Sciulli, and P. Bhagat, "Using eye tracking to assess the impact of advertising appeals on donor behavior," Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 354-371, 2014.
8. M. Baberini, C. L. Coleman, P. Slovic, and D. Västfjäll, "Examining the effects of photographic attributes on sympathy, emotions, and donation behavior," Visual communication quarterly, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 118-128, 2015.
9. R. Bennett and H. Gabriel, "Charity involvement and customer preference for charity brands," Journal of Brand Management, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49-66, 1999.
10. B. K. Behe, M. Bae, P. T. Huddleston, and L. Sage, "The effect of involvement on visual attention and product choice," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 24, pp. 10-21, 2015.
11. F. S. Chen, J. A. Minson, M. Schöne, and M. Heinrichs, "In the eye of the beholder: Eye contact increases resistance to persuasion," Psychological science, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2254-2261, 2013.
12. O. Droulers and S. Adil, "Perceived gaze direction modulates ad memorization," Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15, 2015.
13. N. Dens and P. De Pelsmacker, "Consumer response to different advertising appeals for new products: The moderating influence of branding strategy and product category involvement," Journal of Brand Management, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 50-65, 2010.
14. I. Gugenishvili, R. E. Francu, and N. Koporcic, "I give a dime if you do, too! The influence of descriptive norms on perceived impact, personal involvement, and monetary donation intentions," Journal of Consumer Behaviour, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 167-179, 2022.
15. T. Faseur and M. Geuens, "Communicating the right emotion to generate help for connected versus unconnected others," Communication Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 498-521, 2010.
16. R. J. Fisher, M. Vandenbosch, and K. D. Antia, "An empathy-helping perspective on consumers' responses to fund-raising appeals," Journal of consumer research, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 519-531, 2008.
17. S. L. Grau and J. A. G. Folse, "Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer," Journal of advertising, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 19-33, 2007.
18. S. D'Ambrogio, N. Werksman, M. L. Platt, and E. N. Johnson, "How celebrity status and gaze direction in ads drive visual attention to shape consumer decisions," Psychology & Marketing, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 723-734, 2023.
19. S. B. Hutton and S. Nolte, "The effect of gaze cues on attention to print advertisements," Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 887-892, 2011.
20. E. Hatfield, J. T. Cacioppo, and R. L. Rapson, "Emotional contagion," Current directions in psychological science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 96-100, 1993.
21. M. M. Hajjat, "Effect of cause-related marketing on attitudes and purchase intentions: the moderating role of cause involvement and donation size," Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 93-109, 2003.
22. H. Jang, "Cuteness mediates the effect of happy facial expressions on empathy and charitable donations," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 675-689, 2022.
23. K. K. Kampe, C. D. Frith, R. J. Dolan, and U. Frith, "Reward value of attractiveness and gaze," Nature, vol. 413, no. 6856, pp. 589-589, 2001.
24. H. Y. Bhatti, M. M. Galan-Ladero, and C. Galera-Casquet, "Cause-related marketing: a systematic review of the literature," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 25-64, 2023.
25. O. Koffman and R. Gill, "‘The revolution will be led by a 12-year-old girl’: girl power and global biopolitics," Feminist review, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 83-102, 2013.
26. C. L. Kleinke, "Gaze and eye contact: a research review," Psychological bulletin, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 78, 1986.
27. A. Lang, "The limited capacity model of mediated message processing," Journal of communication, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 46-70, 2000.
28. D. Matsumoto, "Cultural similarities and differences in display rules," Motivation and emotion, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 195-214, 1990.
29. D. J. Maclnnis, C. Moorman, and B. J. Jaworski, "Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads," Journal of marketing, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 32-53, 1991.
30. C. Obermiller, "The baby is sick/the baby is well: A test of environmental communication appeals," Journal of advertising, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 55-70, 1995.
31. N. Mheidly, M. Y. Fares, H. Zalzale, and J. Fares, "Effect of face masks on interpersonal communication during the COVID-19 pandemic," Frontiers in public health, vol. 8, 582191, 2020.
32. D. P. Roy and T. B. Cornwell, "The effects of consumer knowledge on responses to event sponsorships," Psychology & Marketing, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 185-207, 2004.
33. A. Senju and M. H. Johnson, "The eye contact effect: mechanisms and development," Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 127-134, 2009.
34. P. Sajjacholapunt and L. J. Ball, "The influence of banner advertisements on attention and memory: Human faces with averted gaze can enhance advertising effectiveness," Frontiers in psychology, vol. 5, 166, 2014.
35. L. M. Pönkänen, A. Alhoniemi, J. M. Leppänen, and J. K. Hietanen, "Does it make a difference if I have an eye contact with you or with your picture? An ERP study," Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 486-494, 2011.
36. C. Pham and F. Septianto, "A smile–the key to everybody’s heart? The interactive effects of image and message in increasing charitable behavior," European Journal of Marketing, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 261-281, 2020.
37. D. A. Small and N. M. Verrochi, "The face of need: Facial emotion expression on charity advertisements," Journal of marketing research, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 777-787, 2009.
38. R. Lawson, "I just love the attention: implicit preference for direct eye contact," Visual Cognition, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 450-485, 2015.
39. J. L. Tsai, "Ideal affect: Cultural causes and behavioral consequences," Perspectives on psychological science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 242-259, 2007.
40. R. N. To and V. M. Patrick, "How the eyes connect to the heart: The influence of eye gaze direction on advertising effectiveness," Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 123-146, 2021.
41. M. L. Shier and F. Handy, "Understanding online donor behavior: the role of donor characteristics, perceptions of the internet, website and program, and influence from social networks," International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 219-230, 2012.
42. J. L. Zaichkowsky, "Measuring the involvement construct," Journal of consumer research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 341-352, 1985.
43. G. A. Van Kleef, A. Cheshin, A. H. Fischer, and I. K. Schneider, "The social nature of emotions," Frontiers in psychology, vol. 7, 896, 2016.
44. D. Watson and A. Tellegen, "Toward a consensual structure of mood," Psychological bulletin, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 219, 1985.
45. Y. Zemack-Rugar and S. Klucarova-Travani, "Should donation ads include happy victim images? The moderating role of regulatory focus," Marketing Letters, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 421-434, 2018.
