Safeguarding the Reproductive Rights of Single Women in China: Challenges and Reform Directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/35hd0y09Keywords:
reproductive rights, assisted reproduction, gender equality, comparative law, demographic challenges, family lawAbstract
This paper comprehensively examines the legal status, contemporary challenges, and necessary reform directions regarding single women's reproductive rights in China. Against the backdrop of significant demographic shifts, including rapid population aging and declining birth rates, the necessity for inclusive reproductive policies has become increasingly urgent. The study finds that current Chinese legal frameworks strictly condition access to assisted reproductive technologies (ART)—such as in vitro fertilization and oocyte cryopreservation—on marital status, thereby leaving the reproductive rights of unmarried women inadequately protected. Furthermore, the paper critically evaluates and deconstructs common societal and legal objections to expanding these rights. These objections include concerns over the best interests of the child, the potential risks of illegal surrogacy markets, and anticipated difficulties in parent-child relationships. By refuting these arguments through a rigorous comparative analysis with international human rights law and established progressive practices in Australia and the United Kingdom, the research highlights viable pathways for legal modernization. Consequently, the paper proposes several key reforms: the explicit constitutional recognition of reproductive rights, the comprehensive revision of existing ART regulations, the adoption of a streamlined filing system for ART implementation, and the promotion of fundamental shifts in societal perceptions. Ultimately, the paper concludes that safeguarding single women's reproductive rights not only advances fundamental gender equality but also serves as a strategic mechanism to help address pressing national demographic challenges.References
1. M. Gorton, *Helping Victorians create families with assisted reproductive treatment. Final report of the Independent Review of Assisted Reproductive Treatment*, Victorian Government, Melbourne, 2019.
2. A. Sifris, "Dismantling discriminating barriers: access to assisted reproductive services for single women and lesbian couples," Monash University Law Review, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 229-268, 2004.
3. R. J. Cook, "International human rights and women’s reproductive health," in Women, medicine, ethics and the law, pp. 37-50, 2020.
4. C. C. W. Chan and P. C. Ho, "Infertility, assisted reproduction and rights," Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 369-380, 2006.
5. J. G. Schenker, "Assisted reproduction practice: religious perspectives," Reproductive Biomedicine Online, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 310-319, 2005.
6. G. Rallo, F. Negro, V. Piersanti, F. Consalvo, and S. Marinelli, "Medically assisted procreation in times of COVID-19: what impact on health care system organization and the reproductive rights of couples?," Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis, vol. 92, no. 5, p. e2021275, 2021.
7. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law, including W. Dondorp, G. De Wert, G. Pennings, F. Shenfield, P. Devroey, ... and P. Barri, "Lifestyle-related factors and access to medically assisted reproduction," Human Reproduction, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 578-583, 2010.
8. J. A. Robertson, "Assisted reproduction, choosing genes, and the scope of reproductive freedom," Geo. Wash. L. Rev., vol. 76, p. 1490, 2007.
9. R. H. Blank, "Assisted reproduction and reproductive rights: the case of in vitro fertilization," *Politics and the Life Sciences*, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 279-288, 1997.
10. J. Sándor, "Reproductive rights in Hungarian law: a new right to assisted procreation?," *Health and Human Rights*, pp. 196-218, 2000.
11. R. Rao, "Equal liberty: assisted reproductive technology and reproductive equality," Geo. Wash. L. Rev., vol. 76, p. 1457, 2007.
12. K. Mutcherson, "Reproductive rights without resources or recourse," Hastings Center Report, vol. 47, pp. S12-S18, 2017.
13. A. G. Sutcliffe and M. Ludwig, "Outcome of assisted reproduction," The Lancet, vol. 370, no. 9584, pp. 351-359, 2007.
14. M. C. Inhorn, "Right to assisted reproductive technology: overcoming infertility in low-resource countries," International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 172-174, 2009.
15. M. M. Peterson, "Assisted reproductive technologies and equity of access issues," Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 280-285, 2005.
16. N. Chatzinikolaou, "The ethics of assisted reproduction," Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 3-8, 2010.
17. M. W. Tam, "Queering reproductive access: reproductive justice in assisted reproductive technologies," Reproductive Health, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 164, 2021.
18. B. Ostrovska, "Bioethical aspects of ratio between reproductive rights of a human being and the right to life in the process of using assisted reproductive technologies," Evropský politický a právní diskurz, no. 1, pp. 83-90, 2017.
