A Comparative Study of Eastern and Western Theatre Traditions
Keywords:
Eastern theatre, Western theatre, comparative study, cultural traditions, performance aestheticsAbstract
This paper undertakes a comparative analysis of Eastern and Western theatre traditions, focusing on their historical development, aesthetic principles, performance techniques, and cultural connotations. By examining representative theatrical forms such as Chinese Peking Opera, Japanese Noh and Kabuki, Greek tragedy and comedy, and Shakespearean drama, the study identifies both distinct differences and underlying similarities between these two major cultural theatrical systems. The research employs a combination of literature review, case analysis, and theoretical interpretation to explore how geographical, historical, and philosophical factors have shaped the unique characteristics of each tradition. The findings reveal that while Eastern theatre emphasizes symbolic expression, stylization, and spiritual enlightenment, Western theatre tends to prioritize realism, character development, and dramatic conflict. Despite these differences, both traditions share a common purpose of reflecting human nature and social issues through artistic means. This comparative study contributes to a deeper understanding of global theatrical diversity and provides insights into cross-cultural communication and artistic innovation in contemporary theatre.
References
1. L. Martha and A. Kotsaki, "Ancient Greek drama and its architecture as a means to reinforce tourism in Greece," Procedia - Social Behav. Sci., vol. 148, pp. 573–578, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.082.
2. K. Sonik, "The distant eye and the ekphrastic image: Thinking through aesthetics and art for the senses (Western/non-Western)," in The Routledge Handbook of the Senses in the Ancient Near East, Routledge, 2021, pp. 530–557. ISBN: 9780429280207.
3. R. Shmagalo and H. Xian, "The art of the mask and make-up in the traditions of the East and West: artistic features, stylistics, interrelationship," Herança, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 100–112, 2024, doi: 10.52152/heranca.v7i1.789.
4. M. Flynn, "Class Act: East-west: Youth theatre and the making of meaning in postrevolutionary Ukraine," TDR, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 191–210, 2022, doi: 10.1017/S1054204322000442.
5. M. A. Asavei and J. Kocian, "Include me out: theatre as sites of resistance to right-wing populism in Estonia, the Czech Republic and Hungary," Stud. Theatre Perform., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 196–212, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14682761.2020.1834258.
6. N. De Mel, "Actants and fault lines: Janakaraliya and theatre for peace building in Sri Lanka," Theatre Res. Int., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2021, doi: 10.1017/S0307883320000577.
7. G. Druta, Ibsen at the Theatrical Crossroads of Europe: A Performance History of Henrik Ibsen's Plays on the Romanian Stages, 1894–1947. transcript Verlag, 2024, p. 324, doi: 10.14361/9783839470183.
8. L. LePage, "The importance of realism, character, and genre: How theatre can support the creation of likeable sociable robots," Int. J. Soc. Robot., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1427–1441, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12369-020-00637-w.
9. A. Chirita, "Redefining Borders in Contemporary Chinese Theater: Paper Tiger Theater Studio Performing Kafka’s 'The Great Wall'," Mod. Chin. Lit. Cult., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 66–96, 2022, doi: 10.3366/mclc.2022.0005.
10. C. Balme, "Postfictional Theatre, Institutional Aesthetics, and the German Theatrical Public Sphere," TDR, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 14–31, 2023, doi: 10.1017/S1054204323000035.
11. J. Nakamura, "Against the Flows of Theory: Expanding the Ghost with Japanese Noh," J. Dram. Theory Crit., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 151–169, 2021, doi: 10.1353/dtc.2021.0015.
12. J. Fang, "Globalizing the sociology of the arts and culture: East Asian perspectives," J. Chin. Sociol., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 8, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40711-023-00190-9.
13. A. B. Wibawa, "Analyzing the Evolution of Indonesian Wayang Puppetry and Its Fusion with Modern Theater and Perfor-mance Arts," Stud. Art Archit., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.56397/SAA.2024.03.01.
14. R. Tami, F. Faruk, and I. R. Adi, "Hegemonic culture and subaltern: A compromised veil in Indonesian Islamic popular novel," Lingua Cultura, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2017, doi: 10.21512/lc.v11i1.1729.
15. M. Ma and Y. Meng-jie, "Cross-cultural expression of Chinese ballet: symbol, identity, context and empathy," Theatre Dance Perform. Train., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 671–685, 2024, doi: 10.1080/19443927.2023.2293097.
16. P. M. Boenisch, "Encountering a 'theater of (inter-) singularity': Transformations and rejections of shifting institutional dram-aturgies in contemporary German theater," in Dramaturgies of Interweaving, Routledge, 2021, pp. 157–175. ISBN: 9781003187233.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bui Cam Trang (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.